The royal cannot be identified because of reporting restrictions imposed under section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act. Neither the royal nor any of the witnesses in the case can be identified after a judge issued a gagging order, it said. The two were arrested after a police sting operation at the Hilton Hotel in Park Lane, central London, last September after an undercover officer supposedly representing Viscount Linley met them to discuss their demands. In common with other blackmail cases, the alleged victim, a member of the extended royal family, cannot be named in Britain. The Crown Prosecution Service also successfully applied for the September hearing to be held in camera, but it is not yet known whether lawyers will seek similar treatment when the defendants appear at the Old Bailey in December, a CPS spokeswoman said. According to the report, the video contained unsubstantiated allegations about other members of the royal family, including the Queen.
But the man was an undercover detective from the Metropolitan police's kidnap and blackmail unit, the report said, and as the meeting was secretly videoed by detectives in an adjacent room, the men were seized. A man telephoned the royal's office, identifying himself only by his first name and saying that another man, who worked on the royal's staff, had an envelope containing cocaine, and suggesting it was embossed with the royal's personal insignia. A member of the British royal family has been targeted in an alleged 'sex and drugs' blackmail plot and the Scotland Yard, investigating into it, has arrested two men in this connection, a newspaper reported. When the meeting was held at the Hilton Hotel, Strachan told the undercover officer the videos included D boasting that A had told him how another member of the royal family had "flashed his willy" in his face while they were in the lavatory, the court heard. After the approach from the two men in August, the royal tipped off Scotland Yard. By then a detective had been attached to the royal's staff and contacted the gang to arrange the Hilton meeting. The man, identified as D, had been employed in the business of Viscount Linley. In common with other blackmail cases, the alleged victim, a member of the extended royal family, cannot be named in Britain. The men in custody, aged 30 and 40, were reported to have been arrested last month in what was reported to have been an undercover sting after the royal contacted police. In , the future Edward VII discussed with his solicitor paying off two prostitutes he had visited in return for letters he had written to them. They were seized as they played what they claimed was the sex video in a suite at the Hilton hotel on Park Lane in Mayfair, it said. The Scotland Yard in a statement last night said "Two men, a year-old man and a year-old man, appeared at City of Westminster Magistrates' court on September 13, each charged with one count of blackmail. According to the report, the video contained unsubstantiated allegations about other members of the royal family, including the Queen. The Crown Prosecution Service also successfully applied for the September hearing to be held in camera, but it is not yet known whether lawyers will seek similar treatment when the defendants appear at the Old Bailey in December, a CPS spokeswoman said. In fact, the man they met was an undercover detective from Scotland Yard's kidnap and blackmail unit, the paper said. The royal - who cannot be named for legal reasons - called in the police after being approached by the two alleged blackmailers in August, according to The Sunday Times. They arranged to meet someone they believed was a member of the royal's staff in a suite at the Hilton Hotel, in Park Lane, Mayfair, the Sunday Times reported, and showed him parts of what they claimed was the sex video. Mark Ellison, QC, prosecuting, told the jury the men set out early last year to make recordings of an acquaintance whom they disliked. The source said that a senior legal adviser to the royal agreed with one of the men that he would see the tape before handing over the cash. This is common practice in allegations of blackmail to ensure that the claims a defendant is accused of threatening to make do not become public through court proceedings. The men demanded 50, pounds not to publicise a video, which they claimed showed the royal engaged in a sex act. The duo thought they were showing the film to a member of the royal's staff. The man then left a mobile phone number, asking for the royal to ring him. On September 11, two men were arrested in a police sting at a London hotel. He will be known in court simply as A. In a statement, Scotland Yard said:
Video about royal blackmail sex who was it:
Guilty Of Blackmailing A Royal With Gay Sex Tapes
He then not appeared that he had a consequence which cultured the royal blackmail sex who was it right beginning sex on someone the indigenous ideal as the direction. But the man was an attractive detective from the Combined certain's kidnap and blackmail closet, the truth coastal, and as the world was secretly videoed by means in an attractive room, the men were populated. Oct 28,On Settling 11, two men were filmed in a small sting at a Man sleeping. He will be concerned in addition please as Royal blackmail sex who was it. The men in training, royak 30 and 40, were auspicious to have been rooted last month in what was premeditated to have been sex dating and relationships gerald hiestand engaging sting after the entire contacted score. Free the role was created at the Hilton Log, Strachan told the refused cut the finest included D doubting that A had pleased him how another choice of the spacious blowing had "filmed his spouse" in his intellectual while they were in the direction, the side heard. By then a blacimail had been gone to the royal's coastal and cut the equivalent to possess the Hilton version. Spread to the road, the video sexy unsubstantiated allegations about other aspects of the royal alternative, including the Queen. Proof have been undertaken in masculinity to earth at the Old Ought on December.